OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE ELECTORATE IN VIEW OF CONTEMPT OF PARLIAMENT : THE THIRD ELEMENT
Political Party's Suspension Of Registration As Society & Charitable Donations Status While Appeal Is Rendered In View Of Judicial Decision Declaring Elements Of Corruption
"Liberals Pushed For Teacher Strike : NDP" VTC Feb 13 2014
Question : When A Registered Organization - that receives tax advantages - [i.e., Political Party] Continues To Show Moral Contempt [as shown by court records] For Public Peace & Order, What Should Be Done ? And, When ?
Question : When A Registered Organization - that receives tax advantages - [i.e., Political Party] Continues To Show Moral Contempt [as shown by court records] For Public Peace & Order, What Should Be Done ? And, When ?
Presumption : In A democratic constitutional governance system it would be reasonable to recognize that there are four critical sectors to ensure transparency, accountability; and, the meting out of consequences in matters of negligence or corruption within the political process - over and above the subsequent electoral process at the end of term of government.
Contempt issues arise in the BCTF v. BC at the Griffin Decision 2014 where the record reveals that the judge has recognized the BC Liberal Party government as being an aggressor contrary to law by imposing a $2-million penalty for conspiring to create a strike contrary to the public's best interests - and, further, the matter of "contempt" reveals itself in Griffin, J.'s statement of fact that there has been a practise of the standing Liberal government to simply re-issue an Act which was simply a repeat of legislation which she had already deemed contrary to law.
In Canada, there is a fifth factor in ensuring governance integrity and accountability - that being the remote possibility of a military leaders regime assuming power on behalf of the electorate in order to ensure the continuum of peace and order on behalf of the public.
Constitutionally, this military regime is not provided for within the Constitution Act; nor, likely within the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. But, Canada is a signatory to several international agreements and treaties; and, is encumbered within the Declaration of Fundamental Human Rights through its UN membership. And, the monarch Elizabeth II is therein captured / not excluded by right of Royal Prerogative in Canada.
Canada does have a Human Rights Act / in order to embrace obligations that arise, again, through its UN obligations. What does constitute a hate crime ?
Hence, the question that becomes relevant is : "What recourse is available to the electorate in times of evident and continued governance acts of contempt"? And, this is the purview for the electorate (as the Third Element) as advocating on behalf of the general public interest.
Canada does have a Human Rights Act / in order to embrace obligations that arise, again, through its UN obligations. What does constitute a hate crime ?
Hence, the question that becomes relevant is : "What recourse is available to the electorate in times of evident and continued governance acts of contempt"? And, this is the purview for the electorate (as the Third Element) as advocating on behalf of the general public interest.
REDEMPTION : Integrity of the system is an essential duty of care of the electorate. When the process for natural justice is not self-evident; then, creative logic and action enters a paradigm process; through which stability is recovered; and, the integrity of the adminstration of justice is redeemed. It is now apparent - per the Griffin BCTF v BC decision; and, with the appeal application now proceeding through the Liberal government initiative; then, it is time to ensure that siem'stum / respect stands up to be seen ... commencing with the pursuit of restricting the offending party from enjoying the privileges of registration while the appeal process proceeds
... Which, also, raises the question now : DOES THE MONARCH ASSUME GOVERNANCE in the interim ??? / the application of the Coronation Oath and the adoption of the monarchical process through the institution of the BNA Act / the Canada Constitution Act, 1982 / Canada Charter; and, the Universal Declaration of Fundamental Human Rights ???
And, then, there are the matters under the Criminal Code of Canada as related to public officials and facts of corruption as a process of securing a benefit ...
The roots of this nation Canada are coloured by corruption and hatred of a group - of those indigenous to these lands. Working Peoples have laboured and died in order to ensure peace and order shall prevail in the face of poverty and oppression by the corporate, sprititual; and, political sectors who favour greed over fundamental human rights ... there becomes a time when the wall has been reached; when, enough is enough; and, when strong and rightous choices evolve through peaceful redemption of the civil right. DUTY OF CARE constitutes legal stalking.
